Nuclear Semiotics

Intermediate Level Waste Storage at Trawsfynydd, Wales by Greg White

This research was conducted as part of the second year of my residency at Sorbonne University. During this period, I exchanged with professor-researchers, and students whose expertise extended from scientific fields such as nuclear physics to literary and historical studies like the philosophy of technology. The study's original subject was to envisage the legacy of the nuclear world through its future artifacts. It inevitably fell into the field of nuclear semiotics as an effort to communicate to future generations the dangerosity of our nuclear waste repositories.

I did not intend, nor did I find a viable solution to this millennial problem. Instead I took it as an exercise to better understand the various forces at play. Throughout this process, I also met with individuals who serve on national councils that directly address this issue. To my surprise, this particular question is not a primary focus within the nuclear sector. It is often considered a secondary concern, with most research focused on short-term memory (the next hundred years). Anything beyond that is often relegated to be a romantic problematic, sometimes used as a communication tool to entice public acceptance of nuclear culture.

Nuclear Waste in the World

As of 2024, there are approximately 440 active nuclear reactors worldwide1. Each reactor produces about 25-30 tons of high-level radioactive waste (HLW) annually2. This amounts to between 11,000 and 13,200 tons of HLW each year, so where is it disposed of ?

Before 1993, both military and energy industries disposed of their radioactive waste directly into the ocean3. This practice was later banned, inviting the nuclear industry to explore alternative solutions. Among these, large pools, comparable to Olympic stadiums, were created to store spent fuel under the protective barrier of water. More recently, underground laboratories have been researching long-term deep geological storage solutions. The first of these, Onkalo in Finland, will soon be operational. It is designed to securely store waste for up to 100,000 years.

It's safe to say that our nuclear waste will outlast us. Many artists have compared it to prehistoric cave paintings, a legacy we will leave for future generations. This raises an important question: how do we warn humans thousands of years from now about the presence and danger of these radioactive waste sites scattered around the world ? Essentially, this has been the focus of my research.

Map of Nuclear Sites

hover the dots for site details

In order to get a better idea of nuclear culture, I decided to draw a map of all the places with a past, present or future radioactive activity. Created through open-source investigation, it includes a large sample of locations, that of deep geological storage, ocean dumping sites, nuclear accidents, military nuclear testing, and underground research laboratories. The aim of this list is not to provide an exhaustive account of all radioactive matter, but rather to offer a broader perspective on the legacy of nuclear culture.

By hovering over the colour coded sites, you'll understand the aggregates better and get an intuition about the geopolitical dimension of nuclear.

Semiotics for a Distant Future

Nuclear semiotics refers to the study and development of communication methods designed to convey the dangers of radioactive waste to future generations. Given that nuclear waste remains hazardous for tens of thousands of years, traditional communication methods (such as language and symbols) may not be comprehensible to future societies. The described field explores how communication can transcend linguistic, cultural, and temporal barriers, focusing on the resilience of both the message and the medium that carries it. To understand this better let's have a look at some historical proposals that address this problem.

1. Information Center at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)

The Waste Isolation Pilot Plant is a repository for radioactive waste licensed to store radioactive waste in New Mexico, USA for 10,000 years. Since 1983 the department of energy has been working with linguists, archaeologists, anthropologists, materials scientists, science fiction writers, and futurists to come up with a warning system5. Together they have come up with the idea of a roofless information centre placed directly above the storage.

Department of Energy - Carlsbad Field Office - WIPP Permanent Markers Implementation Plan for DOE Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.

The warning and information would be etched into the granite slabs, recorded in the six official languages of the United Nations, with additional space for translation into future languages. They have also considered the use of pictograms, such as stick figures and the iconic The Scream from Edvard Munch's painting. The full details about the plant would however not be stored on site; instead they would be dispatched to archives and libraries around the world6.

2. Hostile Architecture

The 1993 Sandia report explored designs for physical markers that can be seen as a form of hostile architecture7. The goal of these structures is to convey a sense of danger and unease, evoking feelings of bodily harm and creating the impression of a shunned land. Among the proposed designs were landscapes of spikes, which effectively communicate an authentic sense of danger. There were also more subtle approaches, such as the "Forbidding Blocks," a concept similar to the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin. This design features a network of hundreds of stone blocks arranged in an irregular square grid, creating an area that feels disorienting and unusable for activities like farming or any other practical purpose.

Fig. 2. Landscape of Thorns, by Safi r Abidi, 1991. Concept by Michael Brill. Courtesy of the Estate of Michael Brill.

3. Ray Cats

The Human Interference Task Force, established in 1981 by the United States Department of Energy, suggested reconsidering oral transmission as a means of preserving warnings for future generations. Various proposals emerged, including the idea of repurposing religion to create new annual rites or establishing an "atomic priesthood." However, one proposal stands out for its apparent absurdity: the idea put forth by philosophers Françoise Bastide and Paolo Fabbri to use cats as messengers since they are already deeply embedded in our mythology and history. As such they would bio-engineer cats to glow in the presence of radioactivity, thereby warning their owners of nearby danger8. Furthermore they proposed a lore around the glowing cats, to be passed on through music, poetry, proverbs and myths.

Screenshot from "The Ray Cat Solution" a short film by Benjamin Huguet on the subject

The idea has since permeated popular culture. It has been featured in newspaper articles, inspired the award-winning film "The Ray Cat Solution" by Benjamin Huguet, and even influenced music, such as the album "10,000-Year Earworm to Discourage Settlement Near Nuclear Waste Repositories" by Emperor X, which includes a pop song about the ray cats. While nuclear institutions around the world do not endorse this idea as a viable solution, they benefit from the public's engagement, as it contributes to a broader acceptance of nuclear energy as a whole.

A Matter of Medium

The problem can be broken down into two distinct components: the medium and the message. For the medium, it is critical to find a material that can remain intact over vast periods of time, possibly for as long as a million years. This material must also be universally recognisable to future humans. Architectural solutions embody these criteria well, using durable construction materials that are arranged into recognisable artificial structures, ensuring the medium remains relevant and resistant to both material degradation and cultural erosion over time.

While materials like ceramics, glass composites, diamonds, and basalt have potential for long-term preservation, I chose a different axis. Inspired from archaeological discoveries, I found that not only minerals but also organic molecules could attain the level of resilience I was looking for. For example, DNA has been recovered from a mammoth tooth that lived 1.2 million years ago9. I find it fascinating that we can still read this DNA and extract meaning from it. This suggests that if biologists exist in the distant future, DNA could serve as a viable medium to communicate with them. As the molecule of life, DNA possesses a universality, not necessarily for writing messages, but as a substance that forms the basis of "us" potentially inviting intrigue and efforts to decode it.

For this project, I collaborated with Sorbonne's biology department to explore DNA based information storage technologies. Our approach didn't involve rewriting genetic code for biological processes but rather using the nitrogen bases of DNA as encoding characters for encoding information in cold storage. This practice has recently gained popularity in large-scale archival projects, as in theory a single strand of DNA can store up to 215 petabytes.

Two DNA capsules containing the "Declaration of the Rights of Man/Woman and of the Citizen"

Decoding a strand of DNA might seem complex, but the assumption is that any human society will, over time, develop a foundational understanding of biology that leads to the discovery and decoding of their own genetics. Therefore, any technologically advanced human civilisation should eventually be able to decode DNA, whether it’s biological or artificially encoded. A further consideration would be to determine the strategic placement of these DNA capsules. My initial thought was to store them in libraries, archives, and museums.

A Matter of Message

The laboratory I collaborated with gave me the opportunity to encode 1 kilobyte of data into multiple strands of DNA. The next step was deciding what message to encode. Given the small amount of data available, we realised that words alone wouldn’t be sufficient. In the end, we chose to encode the normalised geographic coordinates (latitude and longitude) of a selected list of historical nuclear sites, without adding explicit warnings. Our reasoning was that if one of these sites is uncovered in the future and its dangers are recognised, future generations could then access the precise coordinates of other nuclear waste sites, potentially preventing further catastrophes.

Since this project was more of a case study and artistic one, we also chose to include controversial sites; locations that are only mildly radioactive today but carry significant historical and political tension, particularly in relation to France’s nuclear testing sites in Algeria and French Polynesia. Including these sites serves as an homage to countries that endured colonial regimes, acknowledging the ongoing sense of injustice felt by people in these regions who continue to live with the scars of their ancestors history.

List of Selected Sites

Latitude Longitude Country Place Type
52.216667 11.099722 Germany Morlesben Geological Storage
52.143889 10.642222 Germany Schacht Asse II Geological Storage
61.236944 21.440833 Finland Olkiluoto Geological Storage
32.371667 -103.793611 United-States Carslbad Geological Storage
60.372222 26.347222 Finland Loviisa Geological Storage
35.727396 129.481044 South Korea Gyeong-Ju, Wolseong Geological Storage
46.218942 18.61078 Hungary Bátaapáti Geological Storage
50.375273 12.940155 Czechia Bratrství, Jachymov Geological Storage
50.544383 14.105825 Czechia Richard, Litoměřice Geological Storage
60.407769 18.207755 Sweden Forsmark Geological Storage
60.400292 18.182343 Sweden Forsmark Geological Storage
61.235148 21.481852 Finland Olkiluoto Geological Storage
48.48698 5.355602 France Bure Geological Storage
52.199444 10.387778 Germany Schacht Konrad Geological Storage
51.219043 5.093483 Belgium Mole Underground Research Laboratory
56.250211 93.53636 Russia Krasnoyarsk Underground Research Laboratory
47.578572 8.521575 Switzerland Nördlich Lägern Underground Research Laboratory
45.043544 141.860712 Japan Horonobe Underground Research Laboratory
35.408309 137.233445 Japan Mizunami Underground Research Laboratory
36.421063 127.374651 South Korea Deokjin-Dong Underground Research Laboratory
57.433062 16.659971 Sweden Äspö Underground Research Laboratory
48.611305 -13.480328 United Kingdom Atlantic Sea Underwater Deposit
47.117752 -16.499322 United Kingdom Atlantic Sea Underwater Deposit
47.54692 -17.072878 United Kingdom Atlantic Sea Underwater Deposit
38.529108 -72.067981 United States North Atlantic Underwater Deposit
74.474832 59.653814 Soviet Union Kara Sea Underwater Deposit
71.924519 55.853849 Soviet Union Kara Sea Underwater Deposit
40.075564 130.264912 Soviet Union Sea of Japan Underwater Deposit
55.713358 60.846811 Russia Kyshtym Nuclear Accident
51.38926 30.098728 Ukraine Tchernobyl Nuclear Accident
37.421391 141.032567 Japan Fukushima Nuclear Accident
49.979494 78.06746 Kazakhstan Semipalatinsk Nuclear Testing Site
11.590745 165.505309 United States Bikini Atoll Nuclear Testing Site
11.55639 162.296953 United States Enewetak Atoll Nuclear Testing Site
37.031318 -116.212022 United States Nevada Nuclear Testing Site
73.201885 54.716479 Russia Novaya Zemlya Nuclear Testing Site
41.372166 88.300594 China Lop Nur Nuclear Testing Site
27.09023 71.740603 India Pokhran Nuclear Testing Site
-21.829667 -138.869725 France Moruroa Atoll Nuclear Testing Site
-22.230953 -138.743046 France Fangataufa Atoll Nuclear Testing Site
24.043713 5.042987 France In Ekker, Algeria Nuclear Testing Site
26.312623 -0.075739 France Reggane, Algeria Nuclear Testing Site
41.285795 129.106462 North Korea Punggye-Ri Nuclear Testing Site

The list of coordinates was then transformed into a binary string, which was subsequently encoded into DNA sequences by converting the binary data (0s and 1s) into sequences of the four nitrogenous bases found in DNA: adenine (A), cytosine (C), guanine (G), and thymine (T).

Technology and Tectonics

There are several reasons why both this medium and that message are both imperfect. One of the most apparent issues is that the geo-coordinate system is not unique, and over geological timescales, tectonic plate movements will alter the configuration of the Earth's surface. An accurate coordinate today may become imprecise in the distant future. However, the most unexpected flaw in the proposal is that the laboratory I worked with used a proprietary algorithm to encode the data, making it exceedingly difficult to decode in cryptographic terms. This decision was influenced by the fact that, during the residency, the laboratory shifted its research focus as it transitioned into a startup called BioMemory, which suddenly prioritised protecting its research and intellectual property.

I was initially rather disappointed by this change. However, it also seems fitting, in an ironic way, that initiatives like these (whether artistic or practical) designed to address societal issues often become shaped by the prevailing neoliberal structures. In this case, proprietary technology and commercial interests took precedence, limiting the potential of the underlying research.

An Impossible Fossil

The final work, Fossile Impossible, took the form of a sculpture and was exhibited at the eponymous exhibition, alongside the list of coordinates mentioned earlier. It was seen as a subtle reference to the movie Jurassic Park, where in the opening scene, a scientist shows dinosaur DNA preserved in amber. In this case, however, the DNA containing the locations of the selected nuclear sites was trapped in a block of epoxy resin.

"Fossile Impossible" exhibited at Fossiles Impossibles @ Theatre de la Ville in Paris

By revolving around the sculpture and looking closely you can spot the capsule, a bullet-shaped container holding the vitrified DNA, suspended in the centre of the transparent rock. Since we had excess DNA, we made ten copies each with their own capsule container. The nine others are still in the studio, waiting to be dispatched around the world, or perhaps I'll turn two into a pair of earrings.

Credits

Exhibited during the exhibition "Fossiles Impossibles"
from the 3rd to the 12th of May 2024
@ Theatre de la Ville in Paris, France

Funded by Sorbonne University
Curated by Justine Jean (DRSCS)
(Directorate of Science, Culture, and Society Relations)

Kaspar Ravel - Artist
Daniel Santos-Sales - Archaeology and Programming Intern
BioMemory SAS - DNA writting

Following the exhibition, we were approached by the French national radioactive waste management agency (ANDRA) to participate in work sessions with a multidisciplinary group. The goal is to develop an iconography that conveys the levels of danger associated with radioactive waste in France. This work is ongoing and will continue until 2025.